Close X

Federal Securities Law: Exemptions: Section 4(a)(2) (formerly 4(2))

Federal Securities Law: Exemptions: Section 4(a)(2) (formerly 4(2))

In SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953), the United States Supreme Court confirmed the SEC's position that offers and sales to a large number of employees by Ralston Purina under its stock plan were not exempt under Section 4(a)(2), and provided the following “guidance:”

  • §4(a)(2) exemption focuses on “offerees” and not actual purchasers of the securities.
  • § 4(a)(2) exemption does not depend upon a numerical test; Court rejected SEC argument that extensive number of offerees was sufficient by itself to establish loss of exemption.
  • Availability of §4(a)(2) exemption “should turn on whether the particular class of persons…need the protection of the ['33] Act” and whether the offerees “are shown to be able to fend for themselves.”
  • The Court stated that where offerees do not have “access to the kind of information” that a registration statement would disclose, an issuer is required to provide the same kind of information that otherwise generally would be available in a registration statement.

Contact us Today

The Nick Yocca Law Firm is committed to answering your questions regarding business law, corporate compliance, and other important legal matters in Orange County.

We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment!